Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 14, 2009No. Nos. 00 MDL 1898(SAS), 04 Civ. 3417(SAS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In my June 9, 2009 Opinion, I held that the City of New York (“the City”) may seek punitive damages for claims that proceed under the commingled product theory.1 I also determined that a defendant’s liability resulting from its contribution to a defective commingled product is merely several, as opposed to joint and several.2 However I did not decide “which party bears the burden of proof for apportionment” of liability for such claims.3 The City now moves for a ruling in limine that defendant bears this burden and defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API