City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In my June 9, 2009 Opinion, I held that the City of New York (“the City”) may seek punitive damages for claims that proceed under the commingled product theory.1 I also determined that a defendant’s liability resulting from its contribution to a defective commingled product is merely several, as opposed to joint and several.2 However I did not decide “which party bears the burden of proof for apportionment” of liability for such claims.3 The City now moves for a ruling in limine that defendant bears this burden and defendant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009