Legal Opinion

In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 14, 2009No. 00 MDL 1898(SAS), 04 Civ. 3417(SAS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

643 F.Supp.2d 461 (2009)

In re METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER ("MTBE") PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.

This Document Relates to: City of New York, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Exxon Mobil Corporation, Defendant.

Nos. 00 MDL 1898(SAS), 04 Civ. 3417(SAS).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 14, 2009.

Robin Greenwald, Esq., Robert Gordon, Esq., Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Victor M. Sher, Esq., Todd E. Robins, Esq., Joshua G. Stein, Esq., Nicholas G. Campins, Esq., Marnie E. Riddle, Esq., Sher Leff LLP, San Francisco, CA, Susan Amron, Daniel Greene, Assistant Corporation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (Mtbe) ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API