Legal Opinion

Keown v. Tudor Insurance

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 30, 2008No. Civil 08-00041 JMS/KSCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHANG’S APRIL 17, 2008 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Robert Keown (“Plaintiff’), a realtor, filed this action in Hawaii state court against his professional liability insurer, Tudor Insurance Company (“Defendant”), seeking a declaration that Defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify Plaintiff in a separate Hawaii state action that names Plaintiff as a defendant. Defendant removed the action to this court, and Plaintiff now seeks remand.

On April 17, 2008,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 291, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 398 Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander Dizol, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Smith v. LenchesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. J & L Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Illinois National Insurance v. Nordic PCL Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  2. Burlington Insurance Company v. Panacorp, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
  3. 757BD LLC v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  4. Azad v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  5. Copeland v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API