Legal Opinion

Davis v. Ingersoll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari, brought by Davis, to reverse a judgment which Ingersoll had recovered against him, in proceedings before three justices of the peace of Wayne county, under the statute of forcible entry and detainer, R. S. 1838, p. 490, ch. 5. The cause was argued and determined at the January Term, 1840, of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhipple, J.

Ingersoll instituted proceedings against Davis before three justices of the peace, for an alleged forcible entry and detainer; and the case is brought here by a writ of certiorari to those justices, that the facts, as well as the matters of law, may be reviewed by this court. Upon an inspection of the justices’ return, it appears that the parties, on the 1st of September, 1838, entered into a contract, in writing, by the terms of which Ingersoll undertook to build for Davis a house agreeably to the specifications contained in the contract. Ingersoll agreed to enclose the building and finish…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richter v. CordesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chylowski v. SteinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Appleton v. BuskirkMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Christian v. AmsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API