Legal Opinion

Christian v. Amster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 35,314PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for forcible entry and detainer. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error. Viola Nottingham traded her farm for a stock of goods in Lawton, she giving to defendant a chattel mortgage on the stock of goods and fixtures acquired. Plaintiff, a son-in-law of Mrs. Nottingham, assumed to run the store. Plaintiff was arrested and held in jail in Allegan county for causes disconnected with this case or defendant, who, claiming the stock of goods was run down, went to see Mrs. Nottingham who owned it, and plaintiff’s wife, and stated to them he was going to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Marsh v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Harrington v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Davis v. IngersollMichigan Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. DombrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API