Legal Opinion

Herron v. Schutz Foss Architects

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1997No. 96-308PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an action for declaratory judgment on issues concerning the limits of liability coverage available under a claims-made insurance policy. The District Court for the Twelfth Judicial District, Liberty County, entered Summary Judgment in favor of the insurer, Continental Casualty Company (Continental), and against the plaintiffs, David and Vivienne Herron (the Herrons). The Herrons appeal. We affirm.

We address the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in granting Continental's Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of which policy applies to the Herrons’ claims?

2.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wellcome v. Home InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Youngblood v. American States InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rentmeester v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Brady Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald Dean Berry v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Nimmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Paradigm Ins. v. P & C Ins. SystemsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. ALPS Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. McLean & McLean, PLLPMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. James River Insurance Co. v. TimCal, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API