Legal Opinion

Rentmeester v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 23, 1991No. 90-2443PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Continental Casualty Company (CNA) appeals a judgment requiring CNA to defend and to provide coverage to attorney William Hinkfuss in Marvin and Myrtle Rentmeesters' legal malpractice action against Hinkfuss. CNA contends that because the Rentmeesters made no claim during the CNA policy period as required by its claims made policy, it owes no duty to defend or provide coverage to Hinkfuss. Alternatively, CNA contends that coverage should be denied because it did not receive timely notice of the claim and was prejudiced by the failure to receive timely notice. Because a claim was made during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. NordnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gerrard Realty Corp. v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Chalk v. Trans Power Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Wausau Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Neff v. PierzinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lopardo v. Fleming CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Safeco Surplus Lines Co. v. Employer's Reinsurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API