Legal Opinion

Laventhol & Horwath v. Dependable Ins. Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1990No. 527, 705PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This appeal from an order entering summary judgment involves a complex insurance dispute regarding coverage for losses sustained as a result of employee thefts. After careful review, we conclude that the entry of summary judgment was inappropriate; and, therefore, we reverse.

In 1981, Laventhol & Horwath (Laventhol) approached Republic Hogg Robinson of Pennsylvania, Inc. (RHR) to obtain a policy of professional liability insurance. RHR obtained the assistance of Dependable Insurance Associates, Inc. (Dependable), a California broker experienced in the London insurance market.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Amabile v. Auto Kleen Car WashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Sadtler v. Jackson-Cross Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Garcia v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Meiksin v. Howard Hanna Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API