Legal Opinion

Meiksin v. Howard Hanna Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1991No. 724PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action for wrongful use of civil proceedings, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the lawyer-defendants who had instituted an unsuccessful ac tion to recover real estate commissions on behalf of their broker client. The plaintiffs appealed. They contend, contrary to the trial court’s determination, that whether the lawyers had probable cause for filing the action to recover commissions is a disputed issue of fact which must be determined by a jury. We disagree with this contention and affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court.

In Kelly v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Kelley v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers, Local Union 249Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Shaffer v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Al Hamilton Contracting Co. v. CowderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Bannar v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Korn v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. McKibben v. SchmotzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Turano v. HuntCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API