Legal Opinion
Ursula Griffin v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 25, 1965No. 18505_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Of the three appellants before us, two are presently citizens and residents of the United States, and one is a citizen and resident of Argentina. In 1932, when they were all citizens and residents of Argentina and aged 9, 8, and 6, respectively, they were taken to Germany by their parents, assertedly for reasons having to do with their father’s health and upon the occasion of his retirement on a pension payable to him from a German company. Although it is alleged that the family tried to leave Germany upon the outbreak of war in 1940, and did move to Italy for a time, the availability of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Marie Louise Willenbrock v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- N. v. Handelsbureau La Mola v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Kennedy v. RommelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nathan Chanofsky v. The Chase Manhattan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. KirkseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Paresky v. Board of Zoning Appeal of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985