Legal Opinion
Paresky v. Board of Zoning Appeal of Cambridge
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
The defendant Cambridge board of zoning appeal (board) moved pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1), 365 Mass. 828 (1974), to secure relief from a consent judgment to which it was a purported party. The ground of the motion was that the agreement for judgment was not authorized by the board and was made through mistake. We reverse an order of a judge of the Superior Court denying the board’s motion.
1. The plaintiff Paresky, owner of a building on Boylston Street, Cambridge, in which he operated a travel agency, applied to the board in 1978 to allow him a variance to add two stories to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Parrell v. KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Smith v. Widman Trucking & Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. A. Harvey GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Massey v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Turesky v. CarpMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
- Berninger v. SmallMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
- Duco Enterprises, Inc. v. AbdelnourMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. BrennanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.