Legal Opinion

Carter v. Ide

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 23, 1972No. 46914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

In an action for injuries received by the son from a. dog, father and son plaintiffs, appeal from the grant of summary judgment to the defendant owner.

1. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied. Buffalo Holding Co. v. Shores, 124 Ga. App. 868 (186 SE2d 339).

2. The evidence is substantially undisputed. The issue is whether plaintiff has presented specific facts creating a genuine issue on scienter in rebuttal to defendant’s denial by affidavit that he had any knowledge the dog had ever attacked, bitten or menaced any person. Plaintiffs and defendant are next door…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Buffalo Holding Co. v. ShoresCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Starling v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Banks v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. McCree v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Rowlette v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Turner v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API