Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Eash

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1892No. 576PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant for the recovery of a horse. There was a verdict for the appellee, finding that he was the owner and entitled to the possession of the property, valued at $115, and that the same was unlawfully detained from him by the appellant, and assessing the damages for detention at $150. The court rendered judgment in the alternative, that the appellee have delivery of the horse, or if delivery could not be had that he recover the value and $150 in damages.

Over the appellant’s objections and exceptions evidence *239was admitted, and the jury were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yater v. MullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Romberg v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Everson v. SellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hazzard v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hanselman v. KegelMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lou Leventhal Auto Co., Inc. v. MunnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Ocala Foundry & Machine Works v. LesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Harris v. Dixon Cadillac Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Kramlich v. TullockMontana Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API