Legal Opinion

Kramlich v. Tullock

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1929No. 6,435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This action arose out of the following facts: Plaintiff Anna Kramlich had leased land from Jackson, who was to receive one-third of the crops grown thereon, plaintiff to retain the other two-thirds. Plaintiff had mortgaged her share to Slater. Wheat grown upon the land was shipped to market in the name of Jackson who received the proceeds. Plaintiff’s husband, J. F. Kramlich, owed Bennett and Bennett sued him. Bennett, in aid of his suit got out a writ of attachment, and on January 24, 1927, through the sheriff, attached “all the right, title and interest of the said defendant in the proceeds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Salem Traction Co. v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kerwin v. BalhatchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  4. Cooke v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frisbee v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Crenshaw v. CrenshawMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Barron v. District Court of Thirteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. Stillwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Drescher v. MaleeMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Smith v. MoorheadMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API