Legal Opinion

Martin v. Dematic

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2014No. 89924-0PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 Donald Martin was killed by a machine at a paper plant. His wife, Nina Martin, tried to sue the company that installed the machine, but that company no longer existed. It was difficult for Martin to discern which company was now responsible for the installation company’s liability because the merger and acquisition history of the installation company was particularly complicated. Because of that complicated history, Martin sued the incorrect company and did not realize who the responsible party was until after the statute of limitations period expired.

¶2 This case requires us to determine…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Tellinghuisen v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anne M. Price v. Stacy GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. EPIC, a non-profit corporation v. CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Lori Sweeney, et vir v. Adams County Public Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API