Legal Opinion

Tellinghuisen v. King County Council

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984No. 50792-9PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Richard and Michael Tawney petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision which declined to apply the rule stated in North St. Ass'n v. Olympia, 96 Wn.2d 359, 635 P.2d 721 (1981) to a case which arose before North Street was decided. We reverse.

John and Agnes Tellinghuisen live across the street from property owned by the Tawneys and their wives. When the Tellinghuisens complained to King County about the noise emanating from a welding shop on the Tawneys' property, the County filed an abatement action against the Tawneys. The Tawneys then applied for a rezone to change the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Upshaw v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
  4. Tellinghuisen v. King County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Foothills Development Co. v. Clark County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Segaline v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API