Palmer v. Burnham
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action upon a street assessment. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the plaintiff has appealed from the judgment thereon. The sufficiency of the demurrer is presented by the respondents upon two propositions:
1. In the resolution of intention the city council described the, work to be done in the improvement of the street as follows, viz: *365“That Broadway (describing the portion thereof) he graded to the official subgrade for macadamizing”; and it is objected that by this resolution no jurisdiction to order the work was obtained, for the reason that section 2 of the street…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beveridge v. LivingstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Rauer v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Libbey v. ElsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Taylor v. PolackwichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Union Contracting & Paving Co. v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- City Street Improvement Co. v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.