State v. Kroshus
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
Appellant Jeffrey Kroshus was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344 (1988). On appeal, he contends that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court excluded evidence that the victim had recounted an earlier incident of sexual abuse prior to making her report of incidents involving him. We disagree and affirm the trial court.
FACTS
Kroshus’ conviction was based on evidence that he had engaged in acts of sexual conduct with a resident of the Wilkin County Group Home sometime between November 1982 and February 1986 while he was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BerkelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. CaswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BenedictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. BudisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. DunkelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. HanninenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.