State v. Olsen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct for having sexual intercourse with a victim under the age of 18, appellant argues the district court: (1) committed reversible error when it instructed the jury, “you are to make a decision on this”; and (2) abused its discretion by applying the rape-shield law to exclude evidence offered by appellant to show complainant’s potential motive to fabricate the charge of sexual abuse. Because we conclude that the district court committed reversible error by instructing the jury that it must reach a decision,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. QuickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Lafond LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jairo Missael Fernandez SortoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Javier Zapien-ArreolaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Ryan James MartensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023