Legal Opinion

State v. Benedict

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1986No. C8-86-194PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of the state for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 393 N.W.2d 36, granting defendant a new trial on sexual assault charges involving a young boy. The Court of Appeals reasoned that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a post-trial Schwartz hearing into the issue of juror misconduct and that remanding for a Schwartz hearing now is impractical. State v. Benedict, 393 N.W.2d 36 (Minn.App.1986). We disagree with the court’s conclusion that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a Schwartz hearing. We also have considered the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. State v. CaswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ShoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. FriendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Boitnott v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Grant v. DemskieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API