Legal Opinion

Martin v. Riverside County Department of Code Enforcement

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 2008No. E046276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

This is the second appeal involving a $500 code enforcement citation. John F. Martin was cited by the County of Riverside (County) for grading without a permit. After Martin received an unfavorable administrative decision in a code enforcement proceeding, he filed a petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1094.5, 1094.6) in the superior court. The superior court denied Martin’s writ petition but also offered its opinion that the correct procedure was to seek review by filing an appeal to be heard de novo by the superior court as provided by Government…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Yu v. Signet Bank/VirginiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Byrne v. Santa Cruz County CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. County of Humboldt v. App. Div.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Dedication and Everlasting Love etc. v. City of El MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Fratus v. County of Contra Costa CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API