Legal Opinion

Tudor v. City of Rialto

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1958No. Civ. 5727PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

The lands of plaintiffs herein were subjected by the defendant city of Rialto to the levy of certain assessments on account of sewer system improvements caused to be installed by said defendant city. The other defendants were officers or employees of said defendant city or contractors doing the work of installation of said sewer. Plaintiffs filed their complaint praying for annulment or correction of the assessments and for injunctive relief.

The original complaint, after identifying the legal relationship of the parties to this cause, alleges the commencement and pursuance by defendants of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Town of Los Altos HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Case v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Converse v. JoslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API