Legal Opinion

Walton Et Ux v. Denhart Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiffs brought this suit to rescind a contract to purchase a house being constructed by the defendants. The plaintiffs alleged, as grounds for the rescission, a breach of contract and fraud. The trial court entered a decree denying rescission and the plaintiffs appeal.

There is no evidence of fraud by the defendants which induced the plaintiffs to enter into the agreement. The record shows the plaintiffs were interested in purchasing a new home; the defendant was at this time in the process of constructing a residence in a section of east Portland; the plaintiffs contacted the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. W. Ellison, Son & Co. v. Flat Top Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Krebs Hop Co. v. LivesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Vaughan v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. American Surety Co. of New York v. Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Fenner, Beane & Ungerleider v. DonoskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mohr v. LearOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Matter of Estate of BisioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Robinson v. SpicerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API