Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. of New York v. Scott & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma, County; before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE FACTS. On the 12th of August, 1901, the defendants, Scott and Company, entered into a contract with Lawrence and Cavette, contractors and builders, to construct for them a certain building in the city of Oldahoma City, at a cost of $8,991. The plans and specifications were attached to the contract.

Read the full summary

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma, County; before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE FACTS. On the 12th of August, 1901, the defendants, Scott and Company, entered into a contract with Lawrence and Cavette, contractors and builders, to construct for them a certain building in the city of Oldahoma City, at a cost of $8,991. The plans and specifications were attached to the contract. The plaintiff in error, to secure the faithful performance of the contract on the part of Lawrence and Cavette, entered into a bond or contract of insurance, in writing, with the defendant in error,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Pancoast, J.:

Seven different propositions are contended for as ground of error. We will notice these in their order. The first is as to the examination of some of the jurors. Certain questions were asked some of the jurors on their voir dive, which were objected to and the objections sustained by the court. 'While we think the objections were properly sustained, yet, even if there was error in this regard, it is not preserved in the record. The questions did not go to the competency of the jurors nor to their qualifications as jurors in this particular case, but, it is…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Community Bldg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  2. Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Guilford Lumber Manufacturing Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Walton Et Ux v. Denhart Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. RitterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API