Legal Opinion
Fenner, Beane & Ungerleider v. Donosky
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 22, 1933No. 2845PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELPHREY, Chief Justice.
This suit was instituted in the 116th district court of Dallas county, Tex., by appel-lees, M. *M. Donosky, H. M. Northcott, and W. L. Saling, against the firm of appellant, seeking specific performance of a contract to repurchase certain bonds.
Appellees’ original petition contained the following allegations:
“I. That plaintiffs H. M. Northcott and W. L. Saling are residents of Dallas County, Texas, and the plaintiff M. M. Donosky is a resident of New York City, New York; that the defendant, Fenner, Beane & Ungerieider, is a co-partnership composed of Charles E. Fenner,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Thouvenin v. LeaTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Mattison v. MarksMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kielmann v. MoganMontana Supreme Court · 1970
- Walton Et Ux v. Denhart Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Meyer v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Fenner & Beane v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.