Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Edmonds
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1988No. A037866PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHE, J.
Defendant Real Estate Commissioner (Commissioner) appeals from an order directing him to pay plaintiffs, Dr. and Mrs. Rogers, $38,420.79 from the Real Estate Recovery Account. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10471.) We affirm the order.
The Recovery Account in the Real Estate Fund (Fund) created by section 10470 et seq. is “a special fund supported by license fees to compensate individuals who are defrauded by real estate licensees.” (Vinci v. Edmonds (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1251, 1254 [230 Cal.Rptr. 308].) Section 10471, subdivision (a), as it read at the date of the order appealed from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- City of Redlands v. SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Booth v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zinnemann v. BagnolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002