Legal Opinion
City of Redlands v. Sorensen
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1985No. E000818PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.
The City of Redlands (City) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants.
De Vaul Bridges, Jr., who was employed by the City as a police officer, filed a third party tort action against defendants for injuries he suffered in the course and scope of his employment. City filed an action for recoupment of the workers’ compensation benefits it provided Bridges which was consolidated with plaintiff Bridges’ third party action. (Lab. Code, § 3852.) The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground the fireman’s rule barred Bridges’ action and that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- David Valles John Breslin, and Members of the General Public Similarly Situated v. Ivy Hill CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- People v. Camacho, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.