Legal Opinion

Forest Preserve District v. Hahn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1930No. 20290. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

The Forest Preserve District of Cook county filed a petition in the circuit court of that county for the condemnation of an improved parcel of land owned by John Hahn and Rose Hahn, his wife. The jury returned a verdict fixing the compensation to be paid for the property at $40,000. Judgment was rendered on the verdict, and the petitioner prosecutes this appeal.

The property involved in this proceeding is situated at the northwest corner of Ninety-first street and One Hundredth avenue in a sparsely settled region near Mount Forest, a village in Cook county, southwest of the city of Chicago.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Jacksonville & Southeastern Railway Co. v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ligare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. City of Chicago v. Harrison-Halsted Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. OberlaenderIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. LambertIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City of Chicago v. GiedraitisIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API