Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Farwell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1918No. 12214PublishedCited by 70 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. William L. Pond, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The city of Chicago provided by ordinance for an improvement consisting of a thoroughfare with two levels extending north from East Randolph street along Michigan avenue over the Chicago river and thence north to the center line of East Chicago avenue, which is fully described in City of Chicago v. Farwell, 284 Ill. 491. The appellant, James S. Kirk & Co., owned about an acre and a half of ground of irregular shape adjoining the Chicago river on the north and it was necessary to acquire for the improvement about three-tenths of the tract on the west side. The whole of the land was improved…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Des Moines Gas Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Sanitary District of Chicago v. ChapinIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. South Park Commissioners v. DunlevyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Gloucester Water Supply Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  2. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Forest Preserve District v. Lehmann Estate, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Chicago Land Clearance Commission v. DarrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API