Legal Opinion

State v. Shrum

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2009No. CR-08-0312-PRPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(a)(3) precludes post-conviction relief based on any ground “waived at trial, on appeal, or in any previous collateral proceeding.” Claims predicated on “a significant change in the law that if determined to apply to defendant’s case would probably overturn the defendant’s conviction or sentence,” Ariz. R.Crim. P. 32.1(g), are excluded from the general rule of preclusion under certain circumstances, Ariz. R.Crim. P. 32.2(b). This case requires us to determine when a “significant change in the law” occurs.

I

¶ 2 In February 2003,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. PobleteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Cruz v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Osterkamp v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API