State v. Towery
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 These consolidated actions present the question whether Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) (Ring II),1 which holds that a jury must decide whether aggravating circumstances exist in capital cases, applies retroactively to those defendants whose cases have become final. We conclude that Ring II does not apply retroactively to final cases.
I
¶ 2 Separate juries found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Murray, Mann, Towery, and McKinney committed first degree murder. In each petitioner’s case, the trial judge conducted a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Turner v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- State v. PobleteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Head v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.