Legal Opinion
State v. Poblete
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 28, 2011No. 2 CA-CR 2011-0136-PRPublishedCited by 260 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner Gerardo Poblete seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P. “We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief absent a clear abuse of discretion.” State v. Swoopes, 216 Ariz. 390, ¶ 4, 166 P.3d 945, 948 (App.2007). Poblete has not sustained his burden of establishing such abuse here.
¶ 2 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Poblete was convicted of one count of attempted possession of a narcotic drug for sale. The trial court suspended the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by260 opinions
- Cruz v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cruz v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- State v. Gutierrez-MedinaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.