Squire v. Wing
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
James S. Brown", J.
Motion for an order under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant’s testator were the sole partners of a certain partnership until the death of the testator on November 24, 1960, and it refers to a balance sheet and alleges that the estate of the testator owes plaintiff a certain sum consisting of a capital account overdraft plus one half of a partnership deficit. It further alleges…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Dalury v. . RezinasNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Herrick v. GuildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Estate of KalikNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blattberg v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Michelsen v. BrushDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Squire v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Design Cast Stone System, Inc. v. Nab Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991