Legal Opinion

Squire v. Wing

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James S. Brown", J.

Motion for an order under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant’s testator were the sole partners of a certain partnership until the death of the testator on November 24, 1960, and it refers to a balance sheet and alleges that the estate of the testator owes plaintiff a certain sum consisting of a capital account overdraft plus one half of a partnership deficit. It further alleges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Dalury v. . RezinasNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Herrick v. GuildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of KalikNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blattberg v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Michelsen v. BrushDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
  3. Squire v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Design Cast Stone System, Inc. v. Nab Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API