Legal Opinion

Dalury v. . Rezinas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1920PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 13, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. Plaintiff and defendant Rezinas were copartners conducting a hotel and cafe at Coney Island. Dissensions having arisen, plaintiff commenced an action to dissolve the partnership and a receiver was appointed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 13, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. Plaintiff and defendant Rezinas were copartners conducting a hotel and cafe at Coney Island. Dissensions having arisen, plaintiff commenced an action to dissolve the partnership and a receiver was appointed. Rent being in arrears the landlord (defendant Garms) instituted summary proceedings and obtaining possession of the premises leased the same to…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Hogan, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ. Not voting: Pound, J.

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API