Legal Opinion
Michelsen v. Brush
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 20, 1963No. 63-C-352PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Defendant moves upon the complaint, answer and report of the Special Master herein under Rules 56 and 12, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., for a judgment and order dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted. The complaint, based upon diversity, alleges that plaintiff and defendant were practising law in the State of New York as copart-ners under the firm name of Brush & Miehelsen, which was dissolved on or about March 1, 1962, under a certain agreement dated February 23,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elias Siegelman, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Eva Siegelman, Deceased v. Cunard White Star LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, Walter J. Tuohy, and Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Black v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Atwater v. North American Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maloney v. SingasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Adria Smith Stanton v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Adria Smith Stanton v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- McCauley v. University of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009