Design Cast Stone System, Inc. v. Nab Construction Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
In this diversity action — one of several similar actions, involving the same parties *69(and their corporate affiliates) and the same underlying transaction, being pursued simultaneously in federal and state courts both in Pennsylvania and in New York1 — defendant NAB Construction Company (NAB) has moved, pursuant to Rules 12(c) and 12(h)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a judgment on the pleadings against plaintiff Design Cast Stone Systems, Inc. (DCSS).
DCSS’s amended complaint asserts five causes of action for damages relating to NAB’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Zimmerman v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Shandell v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stahlex-Interhandel Trustee v. Western Union Financial Services Eastern Europe LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003