Legal Opinion

Hageman v. Arnold

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1927No. 6,072PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers

This is a personal injury damage action, based upon assault and battery by defendant upon plaintiff.

By his complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendant violently assaulted and struck him, to plaintiff’s damage; that the assault was without cause or reason and was malicious. He asked actual and exemplary damages. The defense was molliter manus imposuit. The answer made general denial and, by way of new matter, as a separate defense, alleged that, in defendant’s home, plaintiff used toward defendant abusive language and called defendant a liar and disturbed the peace of his home, whereupon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gilham v. DevereauxMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Moelleur v. MoelleurMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jones v. ShannonMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Luther v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wallace v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KeaysMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Skelton v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bennett v. DodgsonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Campbell v. ACandS, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1989
  5. Presser v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API