Legal Opinion

Jones v. Shannon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1918No. 3,931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Valley County; Frank N. Utter, Judge. Action by Ruth Jones against "W. F. Shannon and wife. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal from an order denying them a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

The defendants, W. F. and Lila Shannon, are husband and wife. The husband owns and conducts a public inn or hotel at Glasgow, in Valley county, known as the Shannon Hotel, the wife giving her assistance by acting as housekeeper and exercising a general supervision over the guests and their entertainment, her husband giving her authority to do so. On the evening of November 10, 1913, the plaintiff was a guest of the hotel, intending to spend the night there. She and her husband, Roy Jones, were assigned to a room and were occupying and using it. After narrating the foregoing facts, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  4. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Burns v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cashin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Plouffe v. Montana Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Klind v. Valley County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Bennetts v. Silver Bow Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Worden v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API