Legal Opinion

Gilham v. Devereaux

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1923No. 5,137PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooper

The complaint is in two counts. The first charges that the defendant maliciously debauched and carnally knew Myrtle Upham Gilham, the wife of the plaintiff, without his knowledge or consent; the second that he alienated her affections, and deprived the plaintiff of her comfort, society and assistance, to his pecuniary damage in the sum of $20,000. It also asks the assessment of $10,000 as exemplary damages. At the end of the trial the jury returned the following verdict: “We, the jury in the above-entitled cause find for the plaintiff, and assess his compensatory damages at none dollars and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kiff v. . YoumansNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Schippel v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Hoagland v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Maxwell v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Stacy v. Portland Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Spackman v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Zedd v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Fauver v. WilkoskeMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Mother Cobb's Chicken Turnovers, Inc. v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API