Legal Opinion

Moelleur v. Moelleur

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1918No. 3,903PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; J. J. Lynch, Judge. Action by Eugenia Moelleur against Mary Moelleur, formerly Mary Reynolds. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the alienation of her husband’s affections and prevailed in the lower court. Defendant appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The only contention made in this court is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

Plaintiff and her husband, Dr. Moelleur, lived together in the town of Melrose, where defendant, then Mrs. Mary Reynolds, a widow, also resided. Prior to Christmas, 1914, plaintiff and her husband had frequently engaged in family quarrels, but, according to plaintiff, had at the date mentioned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Hadley v. HeywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Boland v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Miller v. PearceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  5. Rott v. GoehringNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cashin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fauver v. WilkoskeMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Klind v. Valley County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API