Legal Opinion

Strobl v. New York Mercantile Exchange

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 20, 1984No. 79 Civ. 1834 (LFM)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MacMAHON, District Judge.

The lengthy procedural history of this case may be traced through the following decisions which also provide excellent background and an understanding of commodity futures markets in general and Maine potato futures in particular: National Super Spuds, Inc. v. New York Mercantile Exchange, 470 F.Supp. 1256 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (denying implied right of action under Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., and dismissing claims under the Act), rev’d sub nom. Leist v. Simplot, 638 F.2d 283 (2d Cir.1980) (reinstating claims under Commodity Exchange Act) (extensive…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Parrish v. SollecitoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. OKRAYAENTS v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Charles H. Smith v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Marcoux v. Farm Service and Supplies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API