Legal Opinion
Parrish v. Sollecito
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 3, 2003No. 01 Civ. 5420PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Donna Parrish (“Parrish”) brought this action alleging sexual discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the New York State Human Rights Law § 296. 1 Defendants comprise Parrish’s former employers and supervisor, whose alleged misconduct gave rise to this action. On April 11, 2003, after a trial in this matter, the jury returned a verdict of liability against defendants Louis Sollecito (“Sollecito”), James Gallagher (“Gallagher”) and Aeura of Bedford Hills…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Mugavero v. ARMS ACRES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Tlacoapa v. CarregalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- MacMillan v. Millennium Broadway HotelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.