Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Miami County Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 4, 1960No. 8013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By PORTER, J.

Defendant, is on trial on a charge of embezzlement and the most difficult question is whether or not the operator of a collection agency who pursues that as an independent business is-an “agent” within the meaning of the word as used in the section which it is claimed the defendant violated, §2907.34 R. C.

*17The section, in its present form, provides as follows: “No officer, attorney at law, agent, clerk, guardian, executor, executrix, administrator, administratrix, trustee, assignee in insolvency, receiver, officer of a lodge or subordinate body of a fraternal or mutual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  2. The PEOPLE v. RigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. LanyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Zehr v. WardallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FrasherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HoldrenMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API