State v. Lawrence
Miami County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By PORTER, J.
Defendant, is on trial on a charge of embezzlement and the most difficult question is whether or not the operator of a collection agency who pursues that as an independent business is-an “agent” within the meaning of the word as used in the section which it is claimed the defendant violated, §2907.34 R. C.
*17The section, in its present form, provides as follows: “No officer, attorney at law, agent, clerk, guardian, executor, executrix, administrator, administratrix, trustee, assignee in insolvency, receiver, officer of a lodge or subordinate body of a fraternal or mutual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- The PEOPLE v. RigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. LanyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Zehr v. WardallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. FrasherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HoldrenMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969