Legal Opinion

State v. Compton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1969No. 10134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Defendant (appellant) Compton was charged with, convicted of, and adjudged guilty of, the crime of embezzlement. Defendant presented seven assignments of error, all of which raise the ultimate issue of whether the evidence supported the jury verdict of guilt of the particular crime charged in the information.

Embezzlement is defined as “the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been intrusted.” I.C. § 18-2401. The state apparently, though not specifically, elected to charge defendant under the particular statute, I.C. § 18-2405 :

“Every clerk, agent or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. State v. CochraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kelley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FrasherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hurlbert v. Drake (In Re Drake)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1980
  3. Hopkins v. D.L. Evans Bank (In Re Fox Bean Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2002
  4. State v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API