Legal Opinion

Zehr v. Wardall

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1943No. 9228PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

In an action brought by appellants, for damages arising out of an alleged breach;; of contract, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of appellee, and appellants claim error. The suit grew out of a telegraphic order for certain merchandise and the claimed acceptance of the order, or counter-offer, as set forth in a letter signed by appellee.

Counsel for appellants contend that the entire contract between the parties consisted of appellants’ telegram and appellee’s letter. The telegram, dated April 27, 1939, addressed to appellee, reads as follows: “Book 2…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haluka v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Sea Ins. Co. of Liverpool, England, Ltd. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Childs v. Kalgin Island LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hollingsworth v. Key Benefit Administrators, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. v. George & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Lamborn v. SlackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. State v. LawrenceMiami County Court of Common Pleas · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API