Steil v. Humana Kansas City, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel (doc. 78). Defendant seeks an order compelling plaintiff to completely answer interrogatories 2 and 3 of its Second Interrogatories to Plaintiff. Defendant also seeks production of all documents responsive to its Second Request for Production of Documents, requests 1, 2, 5 and 6. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Interrogatories
Defendant’s interrogatories 2 and 3 request identification of “every fact and document” upon which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- IBP, Inc. v. Mercantile Bank of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Ridenour v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Nance v. Wayne CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.