Legal Opinion

Steil v. Humana Kansas City, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 31, 2000No. 99-2541-KHVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel (doc. 78). Defendant seeks an order compelling plaintiff to completely answer interrogatories 2 and 3 of its Second Interrogatories to Plaintiff. Defendant also seeks production of all documents responsive to its Second Request for Production of Documents, requests 1, 2, 5 and 6. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Interrogatories

Defendant’s interrogatories 2 and 3 request identification of “every fact and document” upon which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. IBP, Inc. v. Mercantile Bank of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  2. Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  2. Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  3. Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Ridenour v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. Nance v. Wayne CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API