Legal Opinion
Nance v. Wayne County
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 15, 2009No. 1:08-0043PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT L. ECHOLS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket Entry No. 142) which recommends that Plaintiffs “Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37” (Docket Entry No. 49) be denied. Plaintiff has filed Objections (Docket Entry No. 154) to the R & R.
Although the Magistrate Judge entered an R & R, he did so as the case management judge in relation to a non-dispositive motion involving a discovery matter. See, Local Rule 16.01(e)(1) and 16.02(f)(2). The Motion for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff is not one excepted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adkins v. WoleverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Builders Insulation of Tennessee, LLC v. Southern Energy SolutionsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020