Legal Opinion

Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2007No. Docket 129816, 129818, 129822PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

We granted leave to appeal to determine whether the amendatory provision in the compacts at issue and the exercise of that provision by the Governor violate the Separation of Powers Clause of the Michigan *103Constitution. 474 Mich 1097 (2006).1 We hold that the amendatory provision and the exercise of that provision do not violate the Separation of Powers Clause because the amendatory provision was properly approved by legislative resolution and the Governor’s exercise of the amendatory provision was within the limits of the constitution. Further, we hold that the issue whether the compacts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People ex rel. Sutherland v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Napier v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Harvey v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Adair v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Eric H. v. Ashley H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Eric H. v. Ashley H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Eric H. v. Ashley H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API