Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSchuette, J.
The issue presented to this Court on remand from our Supreme Court’s decision in Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v Michigan, 471 Mich 306, 333; 685 NW2d 221 (2004) (Taxpayers), is whether the amendatory provision in the tribal-state gambling compacts purporting to empower the Governor to amend the compacts without legislative approval violates the separation of powers doctrine found in the Separation of Powers Clause in Const 1963, art 3, § 2. As will be thoroughly discussed, we hold that the Separation of Powers Clause in Const 1963, art 3, § 2 was violated in this instance. We affirm…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Laura Baird v. Gale A. Norton, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, and United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. United States of America, Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Cook v. HardyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Michael Lynn Heard Sr. v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.