Legal Opinion

Sokol v. City of Lake Oswego

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1990No. LUBA 89-050 & 89-051; CA A62965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s remand of the City of Lake Oswego’s comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments, by which property of respondent Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary was zoned for high density residential use. Petitioners do not challenge LUBA’s disposition of their appeal from city’s decision. They assign as error, however, that LUBA’s opinion contains dicta that misinterpret section 56.155(5) (c) of city’s code and that suggest that the section may not be an “essential” consideration in city’s decision on remand. Petitioners argue that, therefore,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whittemore v. Brentwood Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Schrock Farms, Inc. v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. 150 4th Ave. N. Tenant, LLC D/B/A WeWork v. The Metropolitan Nashville Board of Zoning Appeals - Concurring in Part and Dissenting in PartCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  4. City of Jackson v. Mohamed ShehataCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. George Hutsell and Teresa Hutsell v. Jefferson County Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API